Skip to content

Industry · Health Care and Social Assistance

Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability, Mental Health, and Substance Abuse Facilities

NAICS 6232 · 10,250 matched workers · high confidence

Strong Democratic lean
71.8% Democratic, 28.2% Republican

Two-party shares across 10,250 workers in the Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability, Mental Health, and Substance Abuse Facilities industry.

71.8%
28.2%
DemocraticRepublican
Imputed
70.4% D · 29.6% R
Includes lean for unaffiliated registrants
Hierarchy
Health Care and Social Assistance › Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability, Mental Health, and Substance Abuse Facilities
NAICS2 62 · NAICS4 6232
ShareXLinkedIn
Where Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability, Mental Health, and Substance Abuse Facilities falls

Among the most Democratic-leaning industries in Health Care and Social Assistance (90th percentile).

← DemocraticRepublican →General Medical and Surgical Hospitals — 60% DemocraticAll Other Miscellaneous Ambulatory Health Care Services — 63% DemocraticOffices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists) — 61% DemocraticHome Health Care Services — 59% DemocraticFreestanding Ambulatory Surgical and Emergency Centers — 57% DemocraticSpecialty (except Psychiatric and Substance Abuse) Hospitals — 62% DemocraticMedical Laboratories — 62% DemocraticOutpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Centers — 64% DemocraticOffices of Physical, Occupational and Speech Therapists, and Audiologists — 60% DemocraticAll Other Outpatient Care Centers — 58% DemocraticNursing Care Facilities (Skilled Nursing Facilities) — 61% DemocraticOffices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians) — 71% DemocraticChild and Youth Services — 73% DemocraticKidney Dialysis Centers — 61% DemocraticPsychiatric and Substance Abuse Hospitals — 71% DemocraticOffices of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists — 65% DemocraticOther Individual and Family Services — 75% DemocraticAssisted Living Facilities for the Elderly — 57% DemocraticHMO Medical Centers — 59% DemocraticBlood and Organ Banks — 64% DemocraticOffices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners — 66% DemocraticServices for the Elderly and Persons with Disabilities — 68% DemocraticChild Care Services — 70% DemocraticOffices of Chiropractors — 51% DemocraticDiagnostic Imaging Centers — 56% DemocraticAmbulance Services — 48% DemocraticOffices of Dentists — 58% DemocraticOther Residential Care Facilities — 61% DemocraticResidential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities — 71% DemocraticOffices of Optometrists — 60% DemocraticVocational Rehabilitation Services — 64% DemocraticContinuing Care Retirement Communities — 60% DemocraticEmergency and Other Relief Services — 70% DemocraticTemporary Shelters — 66% DemocraticResidential Mental Health and Substance Abuse Facilities — 73% DemocraticFamily Planning Centers — 68% DemocraticOffices of Podiatrists — 57% DemocraticOther Community Housing Services — 66% DemocraticCommunity Food Services — 69% DemocraticResidential Intellectual and Developmental Disability, Mental Health, and Substance Abuse Facilities — 72% Democratic0%25%50%75%100%
Each dot is one of the 39 other industries in Health Care and Social Assistance; size scales by workforce. Hover to see names — click to jump.

How this is measured

VRscores estimate the partisan composition of an industry by linking voter registration records to employment profiles, then aggregating workers up the NAICS hierarchy. The two-party shares above exclude workers with no major-party affiliation.

Read the full methodology or the published Organization Science paper.

Top employers in Health Care and Social Assistance

Other industries in Health Care and Social Assistance

Explore the full dataset

950+ industries, 970+ occupations, 534K+ employers — all with partisan composition.

Open the explorerAsk the AI

Citation

Kagan, Max; Frake, Justin; Hurst, Reuben (2026). “VRscores: A New Measure and Data Set of Workforce Politics Using Voter Registrations.” Organization Science, 37(2), 444–465.
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2025.20402